Writing the Book: The Speed Novel and the "Endless" Story
Writing your first book is always difficult. You don't know how to develop an idea or plan a plot. The middle sags, and you don't know what to write about next. Interesting new ideas emerge, and you want to put the old, unfinished story aside.
Or - on the contrary, to finish it as soon as possible, let it be as good as it gets.
In the end, the story becomes:
A speedy draft, PayForEssay written in a couple or three months, unfinished and inept;
an "endless" story that you write-write, one year, two, three, and it never ends. And it's good if the author is interested in finishing it, no matter what.
What are the pros and cons of these types of stories, and what to do with them - in the process and at the end?
Who writes books quickly? Features of the "speed" approach
Very fast writers, https://payforessay.pro/essay-editing-service/ as a rule, those who have free time, but think little about the story, do not work out the details and do not prescribe the so-called "meat" - details of scenes, descriptions. Speedy drafts are mostly built on dialogue and sparingly described action (got up - ran - ran in) without conclusions about what happened or analysis of the characters' changes. They are littered with "pianos," plot and ideological inconsistencies, and events that have been pulled out of proportion.
The pros of speed novels are obvious:
The story does not hang in the computer for several years and does not press its incompleteness, https://payforessay.pro/buy-essay/ makes it possible to calmly proceed to the writing of the next one;
the author does not have a complex "I'll never finish", he knows firmly that he will finish, and goes to his goal, despite the "pianos", "accordions" and plot voids;
authors are "prolific" - they quickly gain experience with the word, and their personal creative library grows quickly. And it is such writers - able to create three or four books a year - are most in demand by publishers.
But a speedy draft is a speedy draft. And it sometimes takes longer to revise than it does to write. For then you have to think a lot and a long time over the text, to eliminate "royalties", to prescribe "meat" and "justification", ideological and plot conclusions, to rewrite, cut unnecessary (and to understand where and what is not necessary), to finish...
However! "The Portrait of Dorian Gray" was written by Wilde in just three weeks, and it is not a tiny novella, but a brilliant philosophical work.
Hence the conclusion: even a fast novel can be good if it is properly thought through, if the idea is mature, if there is a clearly constructed plot, the backbone of the main scenes and conclusions on them, the ideological basis, a deep understanding of history. In that case you will need to improve only the scenes (add details to the descriptions) and the stylistics. And to specify some minor details. True, such thoughtful work requires more than one month of preparation...
But it is in the thoughtful work often "hangs" those who write a story for several years.
More interesting information: